Tuesday, July 23, 2013

THE CONJURING (2013) movie review



Conjuring, The (2013) d. Wan, James (USA)

Celebrated real-life paranormalists Ed and Lorraine Warren, central to the investigation of the Amityville Horror case, are the focus of this atmospheric if slightly generic haunted house/possession thriller. The two are presented as level-headed researchers, keen to find the natural causes of strange noises and/or unusual happenings but with a firm belief in the supernatural and prepared to use whatever tools necessary to suit the situation. Their latest case comes to them in the form of a Massachusetts residence recently inhabited by a struggling young family, the Perrons, with numerous bizarre and increasingly violent events taking place within after they uncover a hidden stairwell leading to an abandoned cellar filled with the former owners' possessions (pun intended).


There are still a few clunkers designed for laughs, but the overt comic relief elements present in Insidious are largely absent here; the sober tone suits the film and solid performances aid the cause. Patrick Wilson, often insufferably dull, delivers a relatively inoffensive straightforward turn as Ed with 70 sideburns in place. Vera Farmiga, who has also trod genre ground before with Joshua and Orphan, provides a delicately shaded turn as Lorraine who is strong but visibly weakened by her repeated and ongoing interactions with the other side. Lili Taylor is all nervous energy and simple laughs as the troubled Perron matriarch, running a house of young daughters while the pragmatic Livingston ekes out his living as a long haul truck driver.


Screenwriters Chad Hayes and Carey Hayes handily address the "why don't they simply leave the freakin' house" house dilemma - one that plagues most haunting tales - twofold: 1) we are told that Taylor and Livingston have all their money tied up in the house and 2) the Warrens explain that the malevolent spirit may have already attached itself to one of the family members in the form of possession. Though often predictable in its unfolding, the scare sequences are quite effective, including a climactic wingding that ranks favorably alongside those of The Last Exorcism and The Exorcism of Emily Rose.


Despite the wunderkind status he's achieved with the success of Saw and Insidious (two problematic yet wildly lucrative films), Wan remains a capable if unremarkable director. However, I don't think it's any great stretch to say that Conjuring represents his most successfully realized work to date, as its grounded approach relies more on solid characters and cultivating impressive suspense/mood rather than relying on overblown aural jump scares. Perhaps it was the "based on a true story" element that kept him in check - if so, he would do well to seek out more of the same.

5 comments:

  1. I think this is decidedly avergae, unlike the fantastic Insidious. I am well aware of the problems that people have with Insidious, and understand them, but that was just an absolute blast from start to finish IMO whereas The Conjuring feels very much reliant on that old "based on a true story" chestnut. GREAT audio work though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought INSIDIOUS had some good moments, but was undone by a weak third act, some unwelcome comic relief and an overeliance on aural jump scares. Oh, and what was Darth Maul doing in there...? I mean, come on, they must have seen the comparisons coming from a mile away - why make that choice?

      I agree CONJURING is nothing remarkable, but it didn't bug me nearly as much.

      Delete
  2. Had a great time with this movie, even if I wouldn't consider it all that scary. Just fun. Nice review.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No mention of Wan's creepy doll fetish? :)
    I had a good time with this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Honestly, the creepy doll felt really generic...much like most of the movie. I'm really surprised at how much love this one is getting.

      Delete